EBQ, formerly EBQuickstart, is an outsourced sales and marketing provider with a broad revenue-team model. It can make sense when you want managed capacity across CRM, data, marketing, appointment setting, sales, and customer experience.
Coseek is narrower. It is built for B2B teams that mainly want decision-makers reached by phone, with no retainer, no setup fee, and pay-per-qualified-meeting pricing.
The decision is not whether EBQ is a legitimate provider. It is. The decision is whether your constraint is outsourced revenue capacity, or qualified sales conversations from cold calling.
Coseek lens
The useful comparison is not who has the bigger team. It is what you pay for before a qualified sales conversation exists.
EBQ vs Coseek at a glance
| Dimension | EBQ | Coseek |
|---|---|---|
| Primary model | Outsourced sales and marketing teams | B2B cold calling agency |
| Legacy name | EBQuickstart | Not applicable |
| Channels and services | CRM, data, marketing, appointment setting, sales, customer experience | Phone, with responsive post-call emails after real conversations |
| Pricing model | Per specialist / per month, based on half-time or full-time employees | Pay per qualified meeting |
| Public pricing | $5,000/month half-time, $10,000/month full-time, annual commitment reflected | $500 to $2,000 per qualified meeting |
| Best fit | Teams that want outsourced revenue capacity | Teams that want qualified sales conversations without a retainer |
| Main buying question | Do we need managed people across several revenue functions? | Do we want to pay only when qualified meetings exist? |
EBQ sells capacity across revenue functions. Coseek sells qualified meetings from phone-led sales conversations. If your team needs people and process across several GTM functions, EBQ may fit better. If your team already knows the ICP and wants qualified meetings, Coseek is cleaner.
What EBQ does
EBQ is an outsourced sales and marketing provider. Its site describes services across six areas: CRM, Data, Marketing, Appointment Setting, Sales, and Customer Experience.
The EBQuickstart name still appears in older search results and third-party pages, so buyers may see both names during diligence. EBQ's 20-year company history explains the acronym as Edwards, Bontrager, Quickstart and frames the company as support for the sales and marketing lifecycle, starting with business development and cold outreach.
EBQ's appointment setting pages say its team cold calls target accounts and qualifies marketing leads to provide sales-qualified leads. Its lead generation services include cold calling, discovery, qualification, scheduling and confirming sales meetings, warm handoffs, market research, and messaging or script support.
EBQ has also expanded its revenue-services footprint. Its November 2025 announcement said Acquirent, LeadJen, and Vorsight joined its RevOps organization.
That makes EBQ broader than a cold calling agency. The comparison with Coseek should start there.
EBQ pricing and contract model
EBQ's official pricing page lists two public staffing units: $5,000/month for a half-time employee and $10,000/month for a full-time employee. The page says prices reflect annual commitment.
Each project includes 1 Revenue Consultant, 1 Manager per Service, and access to EBQ's tool suite. The pricing page also says annual contracts can be paid monthly and billing is based on the number of full-time or half-time employees.
That is an employee-style buying model. You fund dedicated capacity before knowing exactly how many qualified meetings will result.
Coseek uses a different unit. Coseek charges $500 to $2,000 per qualified meeting. There is no monthly retainer, no setup fee, and no B2B success fee. The first invoice arrives after the first qualified meeting is booked.
The question is not whether EBQ costs too much. The question is whether you want to buy managed people across revenue functions, or pay only when qualified meetings are booked.
Where EBQ is likely the better fit
EBQ is likely the better fit if your team wants outsourced people and process across the revenue cycle.
Choose EBQ if:
- You want support across CRM, data, marketing, appointment setting, sales, or customer experience.
- You need managed half-time or full-time specialists.
- You are prepared for annual-commitment style economics.
- You want a broader RevOps partner with nearly 20 years of operating history.
- You have internal bandwidth to onboard and manage an outsourced team through weekly or recurring management meetings.
- You need more than cold calling and meeting booking.
That is a strong use case. If your company lacks revenue operations capacity, a narrow cold calling agency will not solve the whole problem.
Where Coseek is likely the better fit
Coseek is likely the better fit if you want phone-led qualified meetings without buying an outsourced revenue function.
Choose Coseek if:
- You want to isolate the phone channel.
- You want no monthly retainer and no setup fee.
- You want a defined qualified meeting standard before calling starts.
- You already know the ICP and mainly need direct conversations with decision-makers.
- You care more about qualified meetings than lead volume, MQLs, or general activity.
- You want handoff context from calls: role, company fit, objections, current stack, and next step.
- Your ACV supports $500 to $2,000 per qualified meeting.
Coseek does not sell CRM consulting, marketing execution, full-time staffing, or customer experience coverage. It sells qualified meetings from cold calling.
That narrow scope is useful when your sales team can handle the meetings and close.
The real difference is outsourced capacity vs qualified-meeting economics
EBQ's model sells managed capacity. That can be right when your constraint is people, process, or coverage across the revenue cycle.
Coseek's model sells qualified meeting outcomes. That can be right when your constraint is access to the right B2B decision-makers by phone.
Monthly employee-style pricing asks you to fund a team before knowing how many qualified meetings will result. Pay-per-qualified-meeting pricing asks you to fund only meetings that meet the agreed qualification bar.
Neither model is universally better. The right choice depends on whether the constraint is team capacity or qualified sales conversations.
Use the math.
If Coseek charges $1,000 per qualified meeting and 10 qualified meetings produce 1 closed deal, meeting-fee CAC is $10,000 before internal AE cost. If first-year ACV is $50,000+, that can be a rational acquisition cost.
That is not a promise about close rate. It is the model to pressure-test in a qualified meeting ROI calculator.
If your team also needs CRM cleanup, marketing execution, full-time staffing, or customer experience coverage, EBQ's broader model may still make more sense.
Meeting quality standards to compare before choosing
Before choosing EBQ, Coseek, or another outsourced sales partner, define what you are paying for.
At Coseek, a qualified meeting has to clear four checks:
- Title or role matches the agreed list.
- Company matches the agreed target criteria.
- Specific date and time confirmed.
- Calendar invite sent.
Then ask every vendor the same questions:
- What does the vendor charge for: activity, leads, appointments, specialists, or qualified meetings?
- What counts as qualified?
- Are out-of-ICP meetings replaceable or rejectable?
- Does the handoff include call context?
- Who owns cancellation and no-show follow-up?
- Does the contract require annual commitment, monthly minimums, or dedicated headcount?
- Are you buying a team because you need capacity, or buying meetings because you need outcomes?
The billable unit determines how you judge the program.
Is Coseek the right EBQ alternative?
Coseek is worth a call if you sell B2B with meaningful ACV, want phone-led outbound, and prefer no retainer. It fits teams that care more about qualified meeting economics than SDR activity volume.
EBQ may be the better choice if you need CRM, data, marketing, appointment setting, sales, or customer experience support from one vendor. It may also fit better if you want half-time or full-time outsourced specialists and are comfortable with monthly pricing and annual-commitment economics.
The clean split:
- Choose EBQ if you need outsourced revenue capacity.
- Choose Coseek if you want focused B2B cold calling and only want to pay when qualified meetings are booked.
FAQ
Is EBQ the same as EBQuickstart?
Yes for searcher purposes. EBQ is the current brand, and EBQuickstart is the legacy name or alias still visible across older URLs, third-party pages, and search results.
Is EBQ a cold calling agency?
Partly. EBQ offers appointment setting and cold calling, but it is broader than a narrow cold-calling agency because it also offers CRM, data, marketing, sales, and customer experience services.
How much does EBQ cost?
EBQ's official pricing page lists $5,000/month for a half-time employee and $10,000/month for a full-time employee, with price reflecting annual commitment. Final cost depends on scope and the number of specialists.
Does EBQ charge per appointment?
Public EBQ pricing is based on half-time or full-time employees per month, not pay per qualified meeting. Buyers should confirm the current billable unit directly with EBQ.
What is the best EBQ alternative for B2B cold calling?
It depends on the model you want. EBQ is broader outsourced sales and marketing support. Coseek is built for phone-led qualified meetings with no retainer, no setup fee, and payment tied to qualified meetings booked.
When should I choose EBQ instead of Coseek?
Choose EBQ when you need multiple revenue functions or outsourced specialists. Choose Coseek when you mainly need B2B decision-makers reached by phone and only want to pay for qualified meetings.